Condemn Zionism or be complicit in WWIII
I don’t for a second believe that you don’t know what you are doing when you confuse those who oppose Zionism, a political idea which seeks to oppress mankind, with those who oppose Judaism, a religion of love and peace.
Below: Torah Jews confirm that, according to the Bible, Israel has no right to exist as a country and that Jews have no right to displace anyone from their land.
Go on, newspaper and TV editors, imagine the reaction of your wife and children as violent foreigners came and demolished your homes leaving you destitute.
Would you collaborate and respect that state? Or would you do everything within the Law to throw off your oppressor in self-defence so your children might enjoy a more peaceful and prosperous future than you?
Why then deny that right to the Palestinians?
The Torah condemns usury time and again
Part 1, pages 83-88
If Rabbis are calling for the dissolution of the state of Israel, then why can’t I?
Zionism is state-organised terror
[We] reject the Zionist state and condemn its war crimes
[The] Torah demands all Palestine be returned to Palestinian sovereignty
Let me first say that I have nothing but the utmost respect for those Israelis and Jews who bravely condemn the state of Israel for its crimes against humanity. Judaism is after all a religion which includes the commands given (later) by the Biblical Christ to ‘Love God’ and ‘Love your neighbour…’ in its holy book, the Torah, or the first five books of the Old Testament..
And secondly, let me make it clear, the words quoted above are not my words but those of ‘Jews against Zionism’, an alliance of US-based believers in the Jewish God, IHVH (pronounced ‘Jesus’). One of their spokesmen, Rabbi Dovid Weiss, has blamed Zionism for creating ‘rivers of blood’ and has called for the abolition of the Israeli state.
Does that make him an ‘anti-Semite’?
Because the term is used to condemn the very reasonable critics of the barbaric Israeli regime, it is clearly used in a deliberately misleading way. Conventional research will tell you that the Semites are a race of people which includes the Arabs, the very people who are currently being oppressed as the Palestinians. As those who criticise Israel are by reason standing up for the rights of these Semites, you can see for yourself just how nonsensical the term ‘anti-Semite’ is, in this context.
Nor is ‘anti-Jewish’ correct because the Israeli state is not a Jewish state. Like the regimes of Saddam and Qadhafi, it is pluralist, inhabited by people of different races and religions. (To give it its due, the Israeli Supreme Court has consistently ensured that minorities within the jurisdiction of the state of Israel are guaranteed equal rights. It does though deny those in the Occupied Territories any rights at all, including the right to life).
And let’s face it, no one in this day and age outside a handful of Islamic Extremists is criticising the state of Israel because it is largely full of Jews. Israel is criticised so strongly because it is peopled with psychopathic war criminals, racists and child mutilators. So, editors, it is wholly wrong to call critics of war criminals and racists ‘anti-Semitic’, especially when it has such a chilling effect on the free speech you are supposed to stand up for, and when it is directed against people of peace striving to create a world in which we all have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
But you knew that any way. I don’t for a second believe that you don’t know what you are doing when you confuse those who oppose Zionism, a political idea which seeks to oppress mankind, with those who oppose Judaism, a religion of love and peace.
After all, Zionism is corporatism. Zionism is centralisation. Like fascism, Zionism is the union of State and Corporate Power. Like Nazism, Zionism is anti-Semitic. Zionism seeks to exploit, oppress and discriminate against the Muslims and Arabs and the Jews who genuinely follow God’s commandments, (branding them ‘self-hating Jews’). Zionism is ‘political Judaism’ in the same way the practices of certain Islamic Extremists are ‘political Islam’.
In both cases, the belief system is one created by man in the name of the said religion rather than being part of the teachings of the Prophet or the Holy Book. Since that is the case, wouldn’t it be encouraging to see just a few of the Jews who live in our country condemning the violence of the Zionists, as Rabbi Weiss and his organisation has done? Those most offended by anti-Semitism are in any case most often the political class – and the liberal elite in particular.
They imagine they are being oh-so PC. Yet it is that failure to condemn the Nazis of Zionism that has led to the atrocities we see today in Israel — the indiscriminate culling of civilians; the use of Palestinian children as human shields; the rape of Palestinian women by Israeli soldiers; the use of white phosphorous; depleted uranium and cluster bombs.
The 'State of Israel'
In reality, the towns of the ‘Holy Land’ were named after the Bible rather than being an account of what happened in those towns. In the case of Bethlehem, for example, the meaning is allegorical.
‘Christ is born in Bethlehem’ means that Christ comes to the ‘place of substance’, that is our world of incarnation and form as opposed to soul and spirit.
The latin letters I S R A E L transliterated into Hebrew give us Yod Shin Resh Alef Yod Lamed. These letters can be re-arranged to give ‘Shayler’, when re-transliterated into latin letters.
And we know where this casual contempt, unjustified disgust and downright discrimination — which sees other people as less than human — leads: the massacre of millions of Native Americans; the rounding up of thousands of Jews and dissidents into concentration camps; the shoot-to-kill policy and orchestrated assassination of Catholics on the part of British soldiers in Northern Ireland.
Chapter and Verse — constitution, case law and authorities — showing how God’s Law is recognised as a higher law than anything in their legal system — within that system!
The hexagram or Star of David is a symbol traditionally used by the Cabalists and the Jewish people. It primarily represents the two interlocking but separate triangles of the masculine (pointing up) and the feminine (pointing down), known to some as the ‘Blade’ and the ‘Chalice’.
Others have confused the red version of the Magen David Adom — literally ‘red shield’, which the Rothschilds traded under in eighteenth century and gave them their adoptive name, ‘rot Schild’, ‘red shield’ in German. The two are not related.
In esoteric heraldry, a red shield within a shield indicates the presence of an heir. This is found in both the Coat of Arms of the Rothschild family and the Russian Federation. The Hebrew word for ‘Apostolic Succession’ transliterates as ‘Russia’.
This may account for the zionist elite’s traditional hatred of Russia, which it sought to subjugate through Bolshevism and now, Nato. The two devices differ in one very significant aspect.
The Russian Federation has the double-headed eagle, a symbol of Roman ‘authority’. The Rothschild’s is topped by a Black Dragon similar to the one that greets visitors to the City of London, when entering from the Strand.
I have no recollection of any IRA operation killing anywhere near that many Brits, yet you editors assiduously and dutifully remind your readers of the significant anniversaries of the RA’s atrocities like Omagh or Enniskillen.
There were no such articles reminding us of the anniversary of the attack on the King David Hotel 22 July 1946. In fact, it would be fair to say that these Jewish Zionists invented modern guerilla warfare.
Ironically, the current backers of Zionist violence and oppression come from the other nation conceived and founded in terrorism and most prone to the use of unprovoked violence, the US. Without the $3billion it gets in aid off the Federal government– welfare for the rich which Israel has to be spend in the American arms industry – Israel would be in no position to carry out these war crimes.
And know this editors, what I have wanted to tell you all along: the British intelligence services are penetrated by the Zionists. That’s why they supported the use of cherry-picked, unreliable intelligence to justify the case for war in Iraq.
And it is all of course part of a wider picture on the world’s stage. The Zionists are trying to create the Third World War as part of their efforts to subjugate humanity through repression and debt. The First World War ‘the war to end all wars’ (not) saw the UK’s national debt rocket by over 1,000 per cent in four years. As a nation, we have never really recovered and have since then lived in hock to the banksters.
When I was in Israel, I was surprised by the out-and-out racism of the middle class Israelis filming me for a documentary. Their attitudes reminded me of the Belfast Protestants’ attitude to the Catholics or the attitudes of hicks in the Deep South of the US to black people not so long ago. And we know where this casual contempt, unjustified disgust and downright discrimination — which sees other people as less than human — leads: the massacre of millions of Native Americans; the rounding up of thousands of Jews and dissidents into concentration camps; the shoot-to-kill policy and orchestrated assassination of Catholics on the part of British soldiers in Northern Ireland.
Under the Law of God laid out in the Jewish Torah, no one has the right to steal land off people already using it who respect the rights of others. In the Bible, ‘Israel’ is not a state in the sense of a country but is a state of being, meaning ‘those who struggle with El (God)’.
‘Israel’ should not be confused with the Northern kingdom of Omride kings in the first millennium BC, which although referred to as ‘Israel’ in English is in fact a different word in Hebrew, ‘Izraael’ sometimes transliterated as ‘Jezreel’. Indeed, there is absolutely no evidence of the Kingdom of David or the Empire of Solomon, on which the Jews lay their claim to that land – including the fabled temple on which the freemasons base their belief system, which scholars believe existed around 1000BC to 900BC.
Applying the Torah Law stated above – which is also expressed as ‘Do as you would be done by’ –- imagine, editors, how you would feel if you lived under an occupying force whose territory was taken by violence and coercion at the expense of the land your parents or grandparents peacefully and lawfully lived off.
Imagine they then bulldozed your home, kicked you off your property then built their homes on the very spot. Go on, newspaper and TV editors, imagine the reaction of your wife and children as violent foreigners came and demolished your homes leaving you destitute. Would you collaborate and respect that state? Or would you do everything within the Law to throw off your oppressor in self-defence so your children might enjoy a more peaceful and prosperous future than you? Why then deny that right to the Palestinians?
In law, an occupying force cannot claim self-defence because it is the aggressor. It has already broken the Law. Imagine if the Nazi command had tried to claim at Nuremberg that it acted in self-defence against the French Resistance. Or the Argies claiming they acted in self-defence against the Falkland Islanders? Quite rightly, the Law recognises the right of those living under occupation to use force to rid themselves of their criminal oppressors.
'There's no business like Shoah-business'
Of the four million Jews who lived in Europe, alas, six million died in the Holocaust. The good news?
Five million survived to claim compensation.
Imagine you are fighting the biggest war in history against the largest force of troops every gathered together; you are fighting that war on two fronts; you’ve been fighting for at least three years.
Where do you get the energy and manpower to round up six million people, gas them to death and incinerate the bodies?
The Auschwitz ‘Gas Chamber’ Illusion
This essay argues that well-designed cyanide gas chambers were indeed present at Auschwitz, and did work efficiently, but that they were operated for purposes of hygiene and disinfection, in order to save lives and not take them.
Former Hong Kong banker, Benjamin Fulford, claimed in 2007 that the Black Dragons were a Japanese secret society, allied with the ancient Chinese Red and Green Dragons, set up to oppose Hitler and the Aryan ‘master race’. He argued the society had been re-activated to take on the ‘New World Order’, which in many minds includes the Rothschild family.
In 2011, Fulford quietly changed the group’s name to the White Dragon Society and alleged that the Rothchilds were prepared to pay up to £50trillion to stop the group.
The White Dragon is a symbol traditionally associated with the Anglo-Saxons and their kings, although the creature should more accurately be referred to as a ‘wyvern’ or sea horse. The Red Dragon is also of course on the national flag of Wales and was on the Coat of Arms of the Royal family of Britain until 1604, when the Welsh Tudors were replaced by the Stuarts and the dragon was replaced by a unicorn.
In February 2003 during his enthronement at Canterbury Cathedral Archbishop Rowan Williams wore hand-woven gold silk robes bearing a gold and silver clasp that showed the white dragon of England and the red dragon of Wales.
The forgery charge is in any case an irrelevance. Even if the document was forged, it is clear that the real powers-that-be are making the scenario it predicts, come true, according to the anti-human and anti-law agenda set out within. .
(You might like to acquaint yourself with the evidence that 9/11 and 7/7 were inside jobs, mostly likely carried out by a cabal motivated by these Zionist principles)..
If you think my evidence and analysis is wrong in any of these areas, including the Protocols, then behave like a man or woman of reason. Bring your counter-claims and arguments to the table to discuss rationally and humanely.
If not, accept the validity of my research and message. Accept that the only way to bring down this abhorrent system: tell the public they can lawfully not pay the mortgage or taxes to the banksters and their puppets in government.
In other words, you can help cut off the funding for these heinous and abhorrent crimes to clear your conscience and begin your journey of redemption although – if past form is anything to go by — I fear you will resort to the same old bully boy tactics of the coward across the ages.
If you do, remember this. You will be responsible for contributing to the causes of the Third World War, with all the suffering, murder and mutilation conflict brings. If you’re happy to let that happen, then expect me and many others to pursue you until true justice is visited upon you, and your wife and family, as the receivers of your ill-gotten wealth.
And don’t imagine that your psychopathic Zionist friends in high places will always think you worthy of protection or be there to stop you being brought to justice for the crime of encouraging war.